The pertinent lawful provisions under consideration ended up Sections 2(d) and 5. Section 2(d) described the phrase “sale” for the objective of the case. In accordance with the definition supplied, “sale” referred to the lasting transfer of ownership of the immovable property in exchange for useful thought. The petitioners/defendants didn't https://title-and-ownership-lawye91245.blogitright.com/31308466/illegal-encroachments-lawyer-in-karachi-an-overview